Prediction of Ann Henricksson vs Mary Lou Piatek Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Henricksson vs M. Lou Piatek

Ann Henricksson
USA
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
3
Win
5
Played
2
Win
66
Age
64
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
36
Best Rank
36
0
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Mary Lou Piatek
USA
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
3
Win
5
Played
2
Win
66
Age
64
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
36
Best Rank
36
0
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Henricksson 3 - 2 Piatek
They have played 11 sets in total, with Ann Henricksson winning 7 and Mary Lou Piatek winning 4. The last match between Ann Henricksson and Mary Lou Piatek was at the Philadelphia, 08-11-1993, Round: Q2, Surface: Carpet, with Ann Henricksson getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Henricksson | 3 |
| Piatek | 2 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(Q2) Philadelphia(11-08-93)
Ann Henricksson
6
6
Mary Lou Piatek
3
3
(Q3) Indianapolis(11-11-91)
Mary Lou Piatek
2
7
6
Ann Henricksson
6
6
3
(R4) Little Rock(11-03-86)
Ann Henricksson
6
6
Mary Lou Piatek
3
3
A. Henricksson vs M. L. Piatek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 46.78% (269-306) | Career Total W/L | 46.80% (212-241) |
| 1 | Hard | 2 |
| 2 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Henricksson vs M. L. Piatek Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ann Henricksson has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mary Lou Piatek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ann Henricksson, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mary Lou Piatek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ann Henricksson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mary Lou Piatek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ann Henricksson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mary Lou Piatek winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ann Henricksson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 56/47), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 14/20). Mary Lou Piatek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 104/88), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 31% (W/L 16/36).
- Player level: In the last year, Ann Henricksson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mary Lou Piatek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Ann Henricksson winning 3 times and Mary Lou Piatek being victorious 2 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Ann Henricksson winning 7 and Mary Lou Piatek winning 4.
- The last match between Ann Henricksson and Mary Lou Piatek was at the Philadelphia, 08-11-1993, Round: Q2, Surface: Carpet, with Ann Henricksson getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ann Henricksson has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mary Lou Piatek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ann Henricksson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mary Lou Piatek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ann Henricksson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mary Lou Piatek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ann Henricksson vs Mary Lou Piatek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Henricksson vs M. L. Piatek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 59 | Games Won | 50 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 60% (3/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 75% (3/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 25% (1/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (1/4) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Henricksson 0%, Piatek 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Henricksson 0%, Piatek 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Henricksson 0%, Piatek 0%.
A. Henricksson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-7 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
M. L. Piatek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||

A. Henricksson vs M. L. Piatek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.78% (269/306) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.80% (212/241) |
| 47.04% (612/689) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.16% (482/540) |
| 49.00% (5982/6226) | Games Win/Loss | 48.92% (4511/4710) |
| 45.66% (100/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.17% (104/88) |
| 41.18% (14/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 32.56% (14/29) |
| 46.56% (61/70) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.29% (69/71) |
| 54.37% (56/47) | Grass Win/Loss | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 321.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.03 |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 54.55% (12/10) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 43.02% (37/49) | Futures W/L | 30.77% (16/36) |
| 46% (259/560) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (209/448) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (9/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (10/19) |
| 48% (83/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (62/125) |
| 81% (261/211) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (212/178) |
| 19% (261/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (212/34) |
| 16% (305/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (237/32) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Mon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 05:50 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 12:50 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
00:50
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
06:00
H2H 0-0
11:10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Hersonissos 7 Challenger
Greece
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola